Information ManagementmanagementTechno Management

Decentralize or Centralize? Why?

Why Decentralize?
Wished outcomes:

  • – Flexibility in operations
  • – Sensitivity to the client and the constraints
  • – Empowered and accountable Professionals
  • – Increase customer proximity
  • – Approach internal services to users
  • – Increase the time response
  • – Countering the bureaucracy
  • – Closer Service
  • – Service more accessible
  • – Better understanding of the constraints (link)
  • – Information channel to the top executives

MIT Decentralize or Centralize?
(http://sloanreview.mit.edu/files/2008/12/3822-ex2-lo7.png)

Obstacles when decentralizing:

  • – Lack of skills (professional and management)
  • – Top executive Anxiety
  • – Political Pressure
  • – Need for complex coordination
  • – Running Costs, including coordination
  • – Needs of interdependence (transverse)

Errors when decentralizing:

  • – Decentralize more than necessary …
  • – Lack or failure of coordination mechanisms
  • – Specialty Logic (silos)

Intrinsic conditions for decentralization:

  • – Maturity of actors
  • – Skilled players
  • – Mechanisms for complex coordination
  • – Informal Networks
  • – Safe staffing
  • – Volume of activity sufficient
  • – Policies / procedures well done
  • – Operational Guidance vs . bureaucratic

Risks when decentralizing:

  • – Bursting, rupture
  • – Lack of consistency
  • – Balkanization (closing small empires)
  • – Ambiguity re authority
  • – Ambiguity / displacement loyalties
  • – Secrecy (blackmail)

Why Centralize?
Wished Outcomes:

  • – Facilitate the global coordination
  • – Increase compliance with institutional norms
  • – Increasing security
  • – Economies of scale
  • – Supplementing the possible limited staff skills
  • – Accelerate operational decisions
  • – Improving the quality of business decisions
  • – Facilitate real-time adaptation
  • – Motivate staff operations

Direct Earnings:

  • – Increased and easier business control by executives (orientations)
  • – Security for the “stakeholders”
  • – Simple Coordination

Intrinsic conditions:

  • – Legitimate Authority
  • – Competence content from leaders
  • – Mechanisms / effective communication tools
  • – Small or mechanistic organisation

Risks:

  • – Bureaucratic , inertia, slow
  • – Secrecy
  • – Inadequate Decisions
  • – Increased costs of system

ref: Pierre Collerette MBA’s HEC course

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.